Because we are archaeologists, we concentrate on the history of archaeological exploration and the interpretation of colonial and ancient texts concerning the site. In this introductory chapter, we hope to lift-or at least peek under- the veil of confusion surrounding Chichen Itza. Although there is no reason to think that Chichen Itza was built by aliens or Queen Moo of Atlantis, the city remains a focus of both scholarly and popular interest. These narratives still fuel contemporary interest in Chichen Itza, as do the more recently developed tenets of New Age spirituality. Early explorers, such as Augustus Le Plongeon, merged the two and sometimes created wild tales involving lost continents, unrequited love, sacrificial virgins, and ancient Egypt. ![]() These academic discussions are complemented by a colorful background of popular speculation. ![]() Important scholarly debates still surround its basic chronology and the people who built and lived in the city. With this new interpretation the author hopes to open the door to finding the indigenous name or description of the "chacmool".Ĭhichen Itza is one of the best-known yet most enigmatic cities of the ancient Maya. While most scholars are convinced that chacmools were a genuine innovation for a specific type of sacrificial altar for the placement of an offering bowl, several key questions have remained: (1) What was the culture and place of origin of this remarkable sculptural innovation? (2) Who were these male figures? (3) What is the origin and meaning of the challenging recumbent pose for these human figures with the unblinking, enigmatic gaze? (4) What were they, and what were they called, or described with a phrase, in any Mesoamerican language? Based on recent archaeological discoveries, the author presents a new interpretation of the "chacmool" as the elite "hip ulama" ball game ballplayer stylistically rendered in a serene and formalized ritual “por abajo” stance, well after the game is over, to play the final role as the recipient of the sacrifices. In this paper presented at the Pre-Columbian Society of Washington DC, November 2013, the author proposes answers to questions which have puzzled scholars since the 19th century concerning the enigmatic recumbent Mesoamerican figure known as the "chacmool", so named by French adventurer and photographer Augustus Le Plongeon. With this new interpretation the author hopes to open the door to finding the indigenous name or description of the "chacmool". ![]() The author proposes answers to questions which have puzzled scholars since the 19th century concerning the enigmatic recumbent Mesoamerican figure known as the "chacmool", so named by French adventurer and photographer Augustus Le Plongeon. 4, December 2013, Pre-Columbian Society of Washington, DC. Co-edited with Ian Mursell for Mexicolore () - who added many additional illustrations - based in part on an abbreviated version published in the "Smoking Mirror" Vol. Follow the two (2) URL links to view this 2 page web based article (published May 3, 2015).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |